Acasa InternationalGeopolitica SUA şi Rusia au ajuns la un acord privind arsenalul chimic sirian

SUA şi Rusia au ajuns la un acord privind arsenalul chimic sirian

scris de C.P.
8 afisari

Statele Unite şi Rusia au ajuns la un acord în privinţa planului de plasare sub control internaţional a arsenalului chimic sirian, regimul de la Damasc având la dispoziţie o săptămână pentru prezentarea listei cu arme neconveţionale, afirmă secretarul de Stat american, John Kerry. Statele Unite şi Rusia sunt de acord cu adoptarea unei rezoluţii ONU care să prevadă recurgerea la forţă dacă Siria nu va respecta planul de predare a armelor chimice.

Secretarul de Stat american, John Kerry, si ministrul rus de Externe, Serghei Lavrov.

„Statele Unite şi Rusia sunt de acord cu o rezoluţie a Naţiunilor Unite care va face referire la Capitolul 7 al Cartei ONU, care prevede recurgerea la forţă”, a declarat Kerry după întrevederea pe care a avut-o la Geneva cu ministrul rus de Externe, Serghei Lavrov.

„Nu va exista spaţiu de manevră, ci doar pentru aplicarea în totalitate a planului de către regimul Bashar al-Assad”, a spus Kerry.

„Întâlnirea cu secretarul de Stat american, John Kerry, a fost excelentă”, a declarat ministrul rus de Externe, Serghei Lavrov.

Statele Unite şi Rusia au ajuns la un acord în privinţa planului de plasare sub control internaţional a arsenalului chimic sirian, regimul de la Damasc având la dispoziţie o săptămână pentru prezentarea listei cu arme neconvenţionale.

Statele Unite şi alte ţări occidentale atribuie regimului sirian presupusul atac cu arme chimice comis pe 21 august la periferia Damascului, Washingtonul susţinând că incidentul s-a soldat cu aproximativ 1.400 de morţi.

Preşedintele Siriei, Bashar al-Assad, a confirmat că intenţionează să plaseze sub control internaţional arsenalul chimic sirian. Siria a anunţat intenţia de a semna Convenţia pentru Interzicerea Armelor Chimice. Rusia, principalul aliat al Siriei pe scena internaţională, propune plasarea arsenalului chimic sirian sub control internaţional şi distrugerea acestuia. Siria a acceptat planul, pentru a evita o eventuală intervenţie militară occidentală.

Siria se confruntă, începând din martie 2011, cu revolte reprimate violent şi un conflict militar între forţele opoziţiei şi serviciile de securitate subordonate regimului Bashar al-Assad. Bilanţul violenţelor este, potrivit estimărilor ONU, de peste 100.000 de morţi.

15 comentarii

MalVerde 14-09-2013 - 18:20

911 a fost opera CIA.

digital 14-09-2013 - 18:25

și 112

MalVerde 14-09-2013 - 18:27

ce este 112? zau ca nu stiu

UnUL 14-09-2013 - 18:26

Măluțule drăguțule, suferi de conspiratită acută în fază terminală.

Antibasistul 15-09-2013 - 04:14

Basistule, tu suferi de cretinism in faza terminala, ca toți basistii!

Adi 14-09-2013 - 18:48

Urmeaza al doilea 911 ca sa nu ramana Obama fara petrol. Mai merge cineva cu avionul?

UnUL 14-09-2013 - 19:38

Adișor. văd că conspiratita e epidemică.

Adi 14-09-2013 - 22:16

Au ajuns la un acord pentru impartirea petrolului si gazelor naturale siriene si nu mai e nevoie de bombardamente ca in Libia. Oricum, sirienii fara Assad or sa ajunga ca romanii: someri si cu datorii de sute de miliarde de euro pe o mare de petrol.

jan dinu 14-09-2013 - 22:26

— EI doi — sunt oameni de origine semita shi este
bine ca se inteleg in folosul linistii shi pacii mondiale .
OBAMA a primit premiul …urmeaza PUTIN … care a salvat lumea de
la un nou razboi iminent …
Traiasca NOBEL (descoperitorul dinamitei ) !
JD-USA

briel 15-09-2013 - 01:49

@Vale,

E un blog foarte bun cu 14 cititori (vorba ceea), Financial Times **http://www.ft.com/home/us** , dar care cere subscriptie daca vrei sa le citesti unele articole. Doamne, cata rabdare am !

Asa … daca nu vrei sa platesti, poti citi extrase din misterioasele articole de acolo in alta parte.
De ex.
**http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-16/mystery-sponsor-weapons-and-money-syrian-rebels-revealed**

Citatele sunt evident in italics.

ValVerde 15-09-2013 - 05:13

Americanii s-au cacat pe ei cand au realizat ca rusii nu bluff-eaza si daca se ajunge la razboi, vor reactiona. De fapt … nu chiar americanii, cat Israelul. Printre dinti mesajul a fost clar: lovesti in mine, lovesc in asta micu. Si ce crezi ? Asta micu n-are chef sa aiba victime si distrugeri.
Mai citeste si altceva decat Ziuaveche. Si in general, mai pune mana si pe cate o carte.

===

Eu la „idei” din astea ma refeream, briele.
Stim noi bine de pe care bloguri le iei.

Aia cu ajutorul rebelilor nu o ascunde nimeni.
E parte din mutarile normale inainte de a ajunge la un acord.
Si vor continua asa pina cind Assad si rebelii se aseaza la masa tratativelor.
E parte din intelegerea de azi.

briel 15-09-2013 - 06:49

Tot n-ai inteles. Acum sunt terminat de somn si ma cam duc spre culcare. Iti povestesc maine de la cap la coada, ca pe Capra cu Trei Iezi.

Blogurile pe care le frecventez sunt crystal clear, mereu le-am pus aici ca surse si dovezi, absolut nimic de ascuns. Doar ca stiu si pot sa adun 2 cu 2. Later.

Europeanuul 15-09-2013 - 12:27

ValVerde, cu o gasca de criminali care terorizeaza pop.ulatia (cu arme chimice?) se poate negocia numai un singur lucru: modalitatea debarcarii lor!

ValVerde 15-09-2013 - 15:40

In two weeks, when the U.N. General Assembly convenes in New York, Lavrov and Kerry have said they will meet the U.N. Syria envoy to see if they can push forward a plan for an international peace conference to negotiate an end to the war.

An effort last year for a political solution, dubbed the „Geneva Plan” and calling for a transitional government, went nowhere as Assad refused to cede power and the opposition insisted he could not be a part of any new political order.

Kerry said Saturday’s chemical weapons deal could be „the first concrete step” toward a final settlement. Lavrov said he hoped all parties to the conflict could attend a conference in October, without setting pre-conditions for their attendance.
(Reuters)

Tache 15-09-2013 - 18:07

Truth of US-Russia Confrontation

Daoud Rammal – As-Safir — via Al Manar News Sept 12, 2013

A well informed diplomatic source told As-Safir newspaper that “the US war on Syria had started and ended the moment those two ballistic missiles were fired, leaving inconsistent information, as Israel denied and Russia confirmed, until an Israeli statement was issued indicating they were fired in the context of an Israeli-US joint drill and fell in the sea, and that they were not related to the Syrian crisis.”

The source further told the Lebanese daily that “the US forces fired these two rockets from a NATO base in Spain, and were instantly detected by the Russian radars and confronted by the Russian defense systems, so one of them exploded in the airspace and the second one diverted towards the sea.”

In this context, the source pointed out that “the statement issued by the Russian Defense Ministry, which stated the detection of two ballistic missiles fired towards the Middle East, intended to neglect two points: the first was the location from which the two rockets were fired, and the second was their downing. Why? Because the moment the full military operation was launched, Head of the Russian Intelligence Service contacted the US intelligence and informed it that “hitting Damascus means hitting Moscow, and we have removed the term “downed the two missiles” from the statement to preserve the bilateral relations and to avoid escalation. Therefore, you must immediately reconsider your policies, approaches and intentions on the Syrian crisis, as you must be certain that you cannot eliminate our presence in the Mediterranean.”

“This unannounced direct confrontation between Moscow and Washington increased the Obama Administration’s confusion and certainty that the Russian side was ready to move until the end with the Syrian cause, and that the US did not have a way out of its impasse except through a Russian initiative which would save America’s face…” he added.

From this point, the diplomatic source clarified that “in order to avoid further US confusion, and after Israel denied knowing anything about the rocket firing in its first statement, which is the truth, Washington demanded Tel Aviv to adopt the rocket firing to save its face in front of the International Community, especially since these two rockets were the beginning of the US aggression on Syria and the announcement of the beginning of military operations, after which US President Barack Obama was supposed to go to the G20 Summit in Russia to negotiate the destiny of Syrian President Bashr Al-Assad. However, he went to find a way out of the impasse he’s in.”

The source further indicated that “after the US-Russia rocket confrontation, Moscow intended to increase its number of military experts in Russia, and added to its military units and destroyers to enhance its military presence in the Mediterranean. It also set a time for announcing about its initiative on stopping the aggression on Syria after the G20 Summit, after drawing a side scene on the sidelines of the summit which was followed by two successive visits for Iranian Foreign Minister, Hussein Amir Abdul Lahyan, and Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Al-Moallem, in which a way out was agreed on with the Russian side, and it included a Syrian announcement on approving the Russian initiative regarding putting Syrian chemical weapons under international supervision and preparing Syria for joining the non-proliferation treaty.

Finally, the source pointed out that “One of the first results of the US-Russian military confrontation was the British House of Commons’ rejection to participate in a war on Syria. This was followed by European stances, most significantly, the German stance announced by Chancellor Angela Merkel.”

Translated by Sara Taha Moughnieh

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. OK Mai mult